Assessment 2 — Grading Sheet

XR Experience Analysis & Interaction Prototype

Student Details

Descriptor	Mark Range	✓
Insightful critique, strong use of XR/HCI concepts, clear understanding of trade-offs	70–100%
Clear analysis, good use of terminology, some critical insight	60–69%
Mostly descriptive, limited critique, some relevant concepts	50–59%
Superficial or inaccurate, lacks engagement with course material	<50%

Mark Awarded: _______ / 30

Comments:

Descriptor	Mark Range	✓
Fully functional, strong technical competence, clear understanding of input systems	70–100%
Functional with minor issues, good technical understanding	60–69%
Basic implementation, limited robustness	50–59%
Incomplete or non-functional	<50%

Mark Awarded: _______ / 30

Comments:

Descriptor	Mark Range	✓
Strong, explicit application of principles, clear design reasoning	70–100%
Some clear application of principles	60–69%
Limited or implicit use of principles	50–59%
No meaningful application	<50%

Mark Awarded: _______ / 20

Comments:

Descriptor	Mark Range	✓
Thoughtful, critical reflection, clear identification of limitations	70–100%
Clear evaluation with some insight	60–69%
Basic reflection, limited depth	50–59%
Minimal or no evaluation	<50%

Mark Awarded: _______ / 10

Comments:

Descriptor	Mark Range	✓
Clear, well-structured report, effective visuals and video	70–100%
Mostly clear and organised	60–69%
Some structure issues	50–59%
Poorly presented or unclear	<50%

Mark Awarded: _______ / 10

Comments:

Component	Weight	Mark	Weighted
Critical Analysis	30%	/30
Prototype	30%	/30
HCI Application	20%	/20
Evaluation	10%	/10
Presentation	10%	/10
Total	100%		/100

Strengths:

Areas for Improvement:

Grade: _______

Marker Signature: _______________________ Date: ___________